According to Prophet Muhammad: The Antichrist Will Bring His Own Paradise and Hell

Among the most intriguing and fearsome figures in Islamic eschatology is Al-Masih ad-Dajjal—the Antichrist. This deceptive figure is mentioned in numerous sayings (ahadith) of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), and one of the most striking characteristics attributed to him is that he will bring with him his own paradise and hell.

This concept—Dajjal presenting a deceptive paradise and hell—has deep symbolic and spiritual implications. It reflects not just future events but also timeless lessons about deception, illusion, and the nature of truth. This article explores the meaning, context, and interpretations of this prophecy as conveyed through authentic Islamic sources.

---

1. Who Is the Dajjal?

In Islamic tradition, Al-Masih ad-Dajjal (The False Messiah or The Deceiving Messiah) is a man who will appear near the end of time, claiming to be divine. He is described as a great deceiver, performing false miracles and manipulating people into worshipping him. His emergence is one of the major signs of the Day of Judgment.

The name "Dajjal" comes from the Arabic root dajala, meaning to lie or deceive. Unlike in some Christian interpretations where the Antichrist may be a system or spirit, in Islam, the Dajjal is a specific individual whose physical and behavioral traits were described in vivid detail by Prophet Muhammad.

---

2. The Hadith: Paradise and Hell of the Dajjal

The idea that the Dajjal will have a paradise and a hell comes from several authentic hadiths. One of the most frequently cited is recorded in Sahih Muslim:

Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) said:
“With him (Dajjal) will be a river of water and a mountain of fire. What the people will see as water will be fire that burns, and what they will see as fire will be cold, sweet water. So whoever among you sees that, let him fall into what he sees as fire, for it is sweet, pure water.”
— [Sahih Muslim, Book 54, Hadith 112]

Another hadith from Sahih al-Bukhari reinforces the same idea:

“The Dajjal will come with something like a garden and a fire, but his fire will be a garden and his garden will be a fire.”
— [Sahih al-Bukhari]

These narrations show that the Dajjal’s most dangerous weapon will not be military power or wealth, but deception—especially deception that inverts the reality of truth and falsehood, salvation and damnation.

---

3. Literal or Symbolic? Scholarly Interpretations

Islamic scholars have offered various interpretations of this phenomenon:

Literal View

Many classical scholars took the hadiths literally. They believed the Dajjal will physically appear with what seems to be a river of water (paradise) and a blazing fire (hell), though their actual realities will be reversed. According to this view, the Dajjal will have supernatural powers granted by Allah as a test for humanity, and his miracles will be illusions used to deceive the masses.

Symbolic View

Other scholars and thinkers have interpreted these hadiths symbolically, suggesting the Dajjal’s paradise and hell represent worldly illusions—comfort, luxury, and materialism that distract from the truth of faith. In this view:

• His "paradise" symbolizes the temporary pleasures of the world that lead to eternal ruin.

• His "hell" symbolizes hardship or sacrifice that actually leads to eternal reward.

This interpretation ties closely with the Quranic theme that this world is a test, and often what seems beneficial can be harmful, and vice versa:

“But perhaps you hate a thing and it is good for you; and perhaps you love a thing and it is bad for you.”
— [Quran 2:216]

---

4. The Dajjal’s Tools of Deception

The Dajjal’s ability to present illusion as truth is central to his mission. The Prophet Muhammad warned that:

• He will perform miracles, like reviving the dead or bringing rain.

• He will travel rapidly across the Earth, spreading his message.

• Many will follow him—particularly those who are spiritually weak, ignorant, or overly attached to material life.

In today’s context, some scholars warn that media manipulation, false ideologies, and technological illusions may mirror the kind of deception the Dajjal represents—blurring the lines between reality and fantasy, right and wrong.

---

5. Protection Against the Dajjal

The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) gave specific guidance on how to protect oneself from the Dajjal’s deception:

a. Memorizing the First 10 Verses of Surah Al-Kahf

“Whoever memorizes ten verses from the beginning of Surah Al-Kahf will be protected from the Dajjal.”
— [Sahih Muslim]

Surah Al-Kahf (Chapter 18 of the Quran) deals with tests of faith, including the story of the People of the Cave, the rich man and the poor man, and the journey of Moses and Khidr—all of which contain lessons about recognizing truth beyond appearance.

b. Seeking Refuge in Prayer

The Prophet would regularly seek refuge from the Dajjal in his daily prayers, teaching his companions to do the same:

“O Allah, I seek refuge with You from the punishment of the grave, the punishment of Hellfire, the trials of life and death, and the evil of the trial of the Dajjal.”
— [Sahih Muslim]

This shows the Dajjal is not just a future figure, but a spiritual danger we must guard against every day.

---

6. Spiritual Lessons for Today

The idea that the Dajjal will come with his own "paradise and hell" is more than an apocalyptic prediction—it is a profound lesson in discernment.

In a world dominated by superficial images, material excess, and manipulative narratives, the warning of the Dajjal reminds us:

• Not everything that shines is gold: Comfort and luxury can mask spiritual emptiness.

• Truth often lies beneath hardship: The path to God may be difficult but ultimately rewarding.

• Faith must be rooted in knowledge: Without it, people are easily misled by illusions.

As the Prophet said:

“A time will come when holding on to one’s religion will be like holding onto a burning coal.”
— [Tirmidhi]

---

Conclusion

The Prophet Muhammad's description of the Dajjal bringing his own paradise and hell is a warning against deception, illusion, and spiritual blindness. Whether interpreted literally or symbolically, the message is clear: in the end times—and even today—people will face choices that appear one way on the surface but have entirely different realities beneath.

To survive such trials, believers are urged to seek knowledge, strengthen their faith, and hold firmly to the truth of the Quran and Sunnah. The Dajjal may be the ultimate deceiver, but those who see with the eyes of faith will not be fooled.

According to Prophet Muhammad: The Antichrist Will Emerge in the Middle East — Iran and Between Syria and Iraq

In Islamic eschatology, al‑Masih ad‑Dajjāl (the False Messiah, often rendered Antichrist) is one of the major signs of the Last Day (Qiyāmah). The teachings attributed to the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) include various hadiths describing the appearance, character, and location of the Dajjāl. Among the more frequently discussed traditions are those that claim he will emerge from the East, possibly from the region of Khurāsān, or from areas between Syria (Shām) and Iraq. Some narrations also refer to Isfahan in Iran. Scholars debate which of these reports are most authentic, how to interpret “east,” and whether these references are literal, symbolic, or geographic.

This article examines the relevant hadiths, what they say about the origin of the Dajjāl, how some interpreters link those to Iran, Syria, and Iraq, and discusses the differing views and caveats.

---

Who is the Dajjāl?

Before discussing his emergence, here is a brief summary of what Muslims believe about the Dajjāl:

• He is a deceiver who will come before the Day of Judgment and will lead many astray through miracles, false claims of divinity, and seductive deceit. Wikipedia+2hurqalya.ucmerced.edu+2

• Many hadiths warn believers to be cautious, as his coming is one of the “major signs” of the Last Hour. Wikipedia+1

With that in mind, various traditions attempt to pinpoint where this figure will first appear, or from where his influence will first spread.

---

Key Hadiths on the Location of the Dajjāl

Here are some of the most often cited narrations concerning the origin (or point of emergence) of the Dajjāl:

1. Khurāsān
   A number of hadiths say that the Dajjāl (or people who will follow him) will come from Khurāsān. The classical region of Khurāsān in early Islamic geography roughly refers to a large area in the northeast of the Islamic world: parts of modern Eastern Iran, Afghanistan, Central Asia. hurqalya.ucmerced.edu+1

   One report states:

   “Dajjāl will emerge from a land in the East called Khurāsān, followed by peoples with faces like hammered shields.” islam365.io+1

2. Between Syria (Shām) and al‑Iraq
   Other hadiths describe his emergence (or a key part of his operations) to be “on a road between Syria and al‑Iraq,” and that he will “do mischief right and left” as he moves. hurqalya.ucmerced.edu+2Religious+2

3. Isfahan, Iran
   Some narrations attribute to the Prophet that seventy thousand (70,000) Jews (in one report) will follow the Dajjāl from Isfahan, which is a major city in central Iran. Wikipedia+1

   However, the exact wording and authenticity vary, and many scholars classify these narrations as weak or interpret them cautiously. Religious+1

4. Direction of the East, “Horns of Satan,” Najd, etc.
   There are other prophetic reports that mention the east as a place from which major trials (fitan) will emerge, or from which sources of mischief or “horns of Satan” will arise. One hadith says Prophet Muhammad would stand facing the East and say:

   “The turmoil (fitnah) is here, from where the horn of Satan appears.” Sunnah+2hurqalya.ucmerced.edu+2

   Also, the Hadith of Najd mentions Najd (a region in what is now central Arabia / east from Medina) in connection with afflictions and trials. Some scholars link Najd to Dajjāl or adversities that precede him. Wikipedia

---

Interpretations Connecting Iran, Syria, and Iraq

Putting together these narrations, many Muslims and scholars assemble a picture in which the Dajjāl’s coming is connected with the eastern regions — including parts of Iran (Khurāsān, Isfahan) — and then at some point his influence or activity reaches, or becomes visible, in the area between Syria and Iraq.

• Iran (Isfahan / Khurāsān): Some traditions that mention Isfahan or Khurāsān suggest that either the Dajjāl, or his followers, will originate or pass through those areas. Because Khurāsān is historically very large, in many accounts it includes regions of present‑day Iran. Thus, when some people say “Iran,” they are drawing on those traditions. However, note that “Iran” as a modern political entity is not mentioned in the classical hadiths; rather, the names used are older geographic terms.

• Road Between Syria and Iraq: The hadith about a road between Syria and Iraq is more specific. This suggests a geographic locus in the middle East (the Levant / Mesopotamia region) from which a major part of his mischief spreads. Some understand this as the final stage of his rising influence or as a central battle ground.

• Combined Readings: Some interpreters propose that the Dajjāl will first be known in the east (Khurāsān / beyond), then move (or his influence will propagate) towards the more central Middle East, especially between Syria and Iraq, where much of the final confrontation or widespread fitnah will occur.

---

Scholarly and Hadith Criticism and Variation

It is important to emphasize that these narrations are not uniform; there is variation, and many scholars caution against overconfident claims for several reasons:

1. Authenticity / Weakness
   Some hadiths used to assert specific geographic claims are considered weak (daʻīf) by hadith scholars. Even among those scholars who accept them, many give them lesser weight or interpret them with caution.

2. Translation and Terminology
   Terms such as “east,” Khurāsān, “road between Syria and Iraq,” etc., have been interpreted in different ways. Geographical boundaries in classical times do not always cleanly map onto modern borders. For example, Khurāsān historically included more territory than just modern Iran, and “Syria” or al‑Shām sometimes refer to broader parts of the Levant.

3. Literal vs. Symbolic
   Some scholars suggest that descriptions are not always meant strictly literally. The emergence “from the east” might indicate direction, spiritual origin, or early movement rather than a singular birthplace.

4. Multiplicity of Traditions
   Since there are multiple traditions with slightly different details, reconciling them involves judgment. Some traditions say emergence from Khurāsān, others say from Isfahan, or from the region between Syria and Iraq, or via roads, or by way of followers coming from certain places.

---

A Possible Constructed Timeline of Emergence (Based on Traditions)

While no hadith offers an indisputably clear, linear, geography‑based timeline, one way of assembling the tradition is as follows (with due caveats):

1. Early Warnings and Signs — Various trials, turmoil, afflictions (fitan) increasingly widespread; sources of mischief beginning in the East. Wikipedia+3Sunnah+3Wikipedia+3

2. Emergence (or presence) in Khurāsān / Isfahan area — Either the Dajjāl or part of his network, or many of his followers, are said to come from Khurāsān or “Jews of Isfahan” in some narrations. hurqalya.ucmerced.edu+1

3. Movement toward the Middle East / Syria‑Iraq region — Reports that after his emergence or as events unfold, major mischief, fitnah, or activities of the Dajjāl will involve or culminate in the area between Syria and Iraq. hurqalya.ucmerced.edu+2islam365.io+2

4. Confrontation / Final Stages — Jesus (ʿĪsā) returns, or the Mahdī emerges in some traditions, to confront the Dajjāl; many of the hadiths link the final battles or prayer behind Jesus to occur in/around Syria or Shām after the Dajjāl’s influence becomes widespread. iium.edu.my+2hurqalya.ucmerced.edu+2

---

Do These Traditions Say “Iran”?

One question is whether “Iran” per se (as a modern nation) is mentioned. The answers are:

• Not explicitly. The classical hadiths in Sahih collections and others do not refer to “Iran” as a modern political state. They use older geographic terms such as Khurāsān, Isfahan, Shām, al‑Iraq.

• Isfahan is modern‑day Iran, so some people interpret the references to Isfahan as indirectly referring to Iran. But as noted, authenticity and interpretation vary. Some who mention the Dajjāl being followed by people from Isfahan (or being “from” Isfahan) rely on less well‑authenticated narrations.

• Overlap / Broad region. Given the fluidity of geographic names in early Islamic times, “east,” “Khurāsān,” etc., include parts of what is now Iran, Afghanistan, Central Asia. So references to Khurāsān might map onto parts of Iran depending on how broadly one draws the region.

---

Implications and Why This Matters

Understanding where the Dajjāl is expected to emerge has implications for Islamic belief, eschatology, theology, and also ethics:

• Believers are warned to be spiritually vigilant, especially in regions mentioned, but also generally.

• The exact geographic details serve as signs — believers are encouraged to watch for them, but not fall into speculative extremism or attempt to force events to align.

• The traditions emphasize moral preparedness: good character, strong faith, seeking refuge in Allah, not being deceived by spectacle.

---

Conclusion and Summary

To sum up, according to many hadith traditions:

• The Dajjāl is expected to emerge from the East (often Khurāsān) or have many of his early followers from there.

• At or after that point, significant portions of his activities or mischief will be visible between Syria (Shām) and Iraq, or “on the road” between these regions.

• Some traditions also refer to Isfahan (a city in central Iran) in connection with followers of the Dajjāl or his emergence.

However, these narrations are not all equally strong in terms of authenticity, and not all scholars agree on how literally to interpret them. There is no hadith that definitively declares, “The Dajjāl will emerge from modern‑day Iran,” in terms of political boundaries. Much depends on interpretation of geographic names, metaphor, and context.

Believers who study these narrations are urged to do so with humility, awareness of differences, and awareness that the primary purpose of such prophecies is guidance, warning, and preparing faith, rather than speculation.

The Biblical Antichrist and Maitreya: A Convergence of Prophecy?

In recent decades, a provocative theory has gained traction among some Christian prophecy researchers: the idea that the Biblical Antichrist will be globally accepted, not only by secular leaders and Western societies, but also by major Eastern religions—notably Buddhism and Hinduism—in the form of a long-awaited figure known as the Maitreya.

This theory suggests that the figure described in the Bible’s Book of Revelation, 2 Thessalonians, and Daniel—often referred to as the "man of sin," "lawless one," or "the beast"—will present himself in a way that fulfills the expectations of various world religions simultaneously. In doing so, he will unite humanity under a false peace, spiritual deception, and eventually global dominion. But how credible is this claim, and what are the theological and philosophical implications?

The Biblical Antichrist: A Brief Overview

In Christian eschatology, the Antichrist is a figure of profound deception and power who will arise during the end times. According to scriptures like 2 Thessalonians 2:3–4 and Revelation 13, this being will:

• Claim divinity or set himself up as a god.

• Perform signs and wonders to deceive.

• Establish a global political and religious system.

• Persecute true believers.

• Eventually be destroyed at the Second Coming of Christ.

Many interpretations emphasize that this figure will not appear overtly evil at first. Instead, he will likely be charismatic, peace-promoting, and even spiritually appealing—winning the admiration of millions across diverse cultures and faiths.

Who Is Maitreya in Eastern Thought?

In Buddhism, Maitreya is a future Buddha, a messianic figure who will come to renew the Dharma (Buddhist teaching) after it has been forgotten or lost. He is prophesied to appear in a time of global chaos, bringing peace, enlightenment, and unity.

Key attributes of Maitreya in Buddhist texts include:

• A future savior who will come from heaven.

• Bringing universal love, wisdom, and teaching.

• Establishing a golden age of peace and understanding.

• Being recognized by his spiritual authority and compassion.

While Hinduism does not have a direct equivalent of Maitreya, some Hindu groups blend Buddhist and Hindu eschatology. Additionally, Kalki, the tenth and final avatar of Vishnu, is also expected to come at the end of the current Kali Yuga (dark age) to restore righteousness and destroy evil. Both Maitreya and Kalki are apocalyptic redeemers, and both are awaited by millions.

In recent decades, some New Age interpretations have fused Maitreya and Kalki, portraying a universal world teacher who will transcend religion and unite the globe.

The Theory: A Single Global Figure?

Certain Christian researchers, such as Constance Cumbey, Dave Hunt, and others in prophecy-focused circles, have warned that a future charismatic world leader could present himself as the fulfillment of multiple religious messianic prophecies—including those of Jesus (to Christians), the Mahdi or Isa (to Muslims), Maitreya (to Buddhists), and Kalki (to Hindus).

The core idea is this: the Antichrist will not come only in the name of political power, but spiritual authority. He will be a “man of peace,” appealing to the deepest hopes of humanity—offering unity, enlightenment, and an end to war. To Buddhists, he may be called Maitreya. To Hindus, Kalki. To New Agers, the World Teacher. And to secularists, perhaps a visionary globalist.

This theory aligns with Revelation 13:3-4, which describes a world marveling at the beast, asking, “Who is like the beast? Who can wage war against it?” Such language suggests universal admiration—not merely political compliance.

Why Would Buddhists and Hindus Accept Such a Figure?

To many Buddhists and Hindus, religious belief is non-exclusivist. Unlike Abrahamic faiths, these traditions are more open to multiple interpretations of divinity or enlightenment. Therefore, if a figure arose claiming to fulfill the characteristics of Maitreya or Kalki—offering wisdom, peace, and supernatural insight—he could be readily embraced, especially in an age of crisis.

Furthermore:

• Maitreya is not strictly defined in Buddhist scripture. His appearance, identity, and timeline are vague, leaving room for reinterpretation.

• In some New Age circles, Maitreya is viewed as a cosmic being who will guide humanity into a new spiritual era—again, without rigid doctrinal requirements.

• Eastern syncretism makes it plausible for a single person to be interpreted as fulfilling various spiritual roles.

If such a figure performed miracles, spoke of universal compassion, and promoted spiritual awakening, he could easily be received as Maitreya by millions of Buddhists and Hindus—especially if global turmoil preceded his arrival.

Is This Already Happening?

There have been modern movements that hint at this convergence. For instance:

• The Share International organization, founded by Benjamin Creme, openly promoted a figure called Maitreya who they claimed would soon appear as a World Teacher, recognized by all religions.

• Creme stated that Maitreya was already living among humanity and would soon emerge to guide the world. Though mainstream Buddhism and Hinduism rejected these claims, they gained followers in New Age communities.

Some Christian theorists have pointed to these types of movements as spiritual conditioning—preparing the world to accept a single global savior figure who will ultimately fulfill the role of the Antichrist.

Scriptural Warnings of Global Religious Deception

The Bible includes several warnings that, in the end times, false Christs and false prophets will arise, performing signs and wonders to deceive, “if possible, even the elect” (Matthew 24:24). The Apostle Paul writes in 2 Thessalonians 2 that the Antichrist will come with “all power and signs and lying wonders.”

This has led many to conclude that the Antichrist will masquerade as a benevolent spiritual leader, drawing in followers from every major religion, each believing he is their long-awaited redeemer.

In this interpretation, the deception is not just political or economic—but deeply spiritual, appealing to human longing for peace, enlightenment, and unity, but leading ultimately to rebellion against the true God.

Criticisms of This Theory

Skeptics—both secular and religious—point out several flaws in this theory:

1. Doctrinal Differences: The Antichrist figure of Christianity is diametrically opposed to the peaceful savior envisioned in Buddhist and Hindu texts. The differences may be too vast to reconcile.

2. Speculative Nature: Much of the theory is built on inference and interpretation, rather than direct scriptural evidence.

3. Lack of Consensus: Neither mainstream Buddhist nor Hindu authorities endorse such a convergence of messianic expectations.

Nonetheless, the theory persists—especially among evangelical and dispensationalist Christians—as a possible framework for understanding how a singular deceptive figure could achieve global influence.

Conclusion: A Unifying Deception?

Whether or not one accepts the theory, it reflects an important theme in religious eschatology: humanity’s desire for a redeemer, especially in times of global crisis. In such an environment, it is plausible—at least sociologically—for a figure to emerge who claims to fulfill the hopes of multiple faiths.

To some Christians, this is precisely what Scripture warns about: a global, deceptive leader who will be welcomed with open arms, only to ultimately lead the world away from truth. Whether called Maitreya, Kalki, or simply the World Teacher, the possibility of a global false messiah remains a powerful and sobering topic of discussion in prophecy and theology.

The Prophet, Muhammad saw the Antichrist in his dream walking behind Jesus around the Kaabah (The Antichrist will emulate Jesus)

A Prophetic Dream: Context and Content

One night, Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) had a dream while sleeping near the Kaʿbah in Makkah. According to the narration by ʿAbdullāh ibn ʿUmar—recorded in Sahih al‑Bukhārī—he saw two figures performing tawāf (circumambulation) around the Kaʿbah.

The first figure was described as:

• Having a reddish‑white (brownish) complexion, among the most beautiful in that shade;

• With straight (lank) hair down to the shoulders;

• Water was dripping from his head;

• He was walking while placing his hands on the shoulders of two men.

• When asked, companions replied: “That is the Messiah, the son of Mary.”
  myIslamicDream Maktabah Hadith & Quran

The second figure appeared directly behind him:

• Described as a large-bodied man with a reddish complexion, very curly hair;

• Blind in the right eye, with that eye protruding like a bulging grape;

• He, too, placed his hands on another man’s shoulders while performing tawāf.

• When asked, companions replied: “That is al‑Masīḥ ad‑Dajjāl (the Dajjal, the false Messiah).”
  Maktabah Hadith & Quran Prima Quran

This vivid dream serves as a symbolic tableau, contrasting the true Messiah—gentle, calm, and guided—against the Dajjal—deceptive, distorted, and dangerous.

---

Islamic Eschatological Themes & Symbolism

Significance of the Dream

• Prophetic Vision: Dreams hold particular significance in Islam, especially when received by the Prophet (peace be upon him). The Qurʾān notes that “Perfect dreams” are a form of revelation (Sūrah Yūsuf 12:6). This dream is considered a true vision—one of the seventy chosen by Allah.

• Symbolic Leadership: Walking around the Kaʿbah—the spiritual heart of Islam—implies a place of central authority. ʿĪsā walking calmly symbolizes truth, spiritual legitimacy, and leadership; the Dajjal’s looming presence behind him signifies deception, falsehood, and imminent tribulation.

Character Descriptions and Their Meanings

• ʿĪsā (Jesus):

  • Reddish‑white complexion: Symbolizes purity and nobility.

  • Wet, lank hair: Often interpreted as a sign of spiritual serenity and humility.

• Dajjal (Antichrist):

  • Blind right eye and grape‑like bulge: Represents spiritual blindness—though outwardly charismatic, internally deceitful.

  • Curly hair and large body: Suggests disarray and distortion of truth.

  • These traits reinforce his nature as a deceiver of humanity, masquerading with charisma but spiritually hollow.

---

Eschatological Context

In Islamic tradition, the Dajjal's emergence is a major sign before the Day of Judgment. His deception will be widespread, and he is said to perform apparent miracles—claiming divine power, and deceiving many. Eventually, ʿĪsā (Jesus) will descend, expose the Dajjal’s falsehood, defeat him, and restore justice and monotheism.
Wikipedia

The dream encapsulates this cosmic clash: the righteous figure proceeding with dignity, the impostor tainting the path behind, setting the stage for the final confrontation between truth and falsehood.

---

Broader Interpretations & Reflections

Spiritual Vigilance

The dream warns of the need for vigilant faith. It reminds believers that truth may appear gentle and humble, while falsehood may lurk boldly behind it—mandating discernment and steadfastness.

Return of Jesus (ʿĪsā)

The imagery also alludes to the awaited return of ʿĪsā, a central theme in Islamic eschatology. His presence in the sacred precincts of the Kaʿbah underscores his role in restoring authentic faith.

Cultural Resonance

This narrative has been presented in diverse Islamic sources and serves as a powerful reminder across communities of the cosmic dimensions of eschatology—not only as historical prophecy but a continual call for moral clarity.

---

Public Reflections: Online Commentary

Community discussions reflect deep curiosity about these hadiths. As shared on Reddit:

“The dream shows the Messiah—as walking calmly—while the Dajjal is the deceiver behind him.”
Though users agree the Quran doesn’t mention the Antichrist, the hadith literature strongly frames his eschatological role.
Reddit

Others note that descriptions serve symbolic functions, not literal physical instruction—prompting deeper theological reflection on how truth and falsehood manifest.

---

Conclusion

This prophetic dream—vivid, symbolic, and deeply layered—conveys a timeless message:

• Contrasting Figures: ʿĪsā (Jesus) symbolizes truth, humility, and authentic spiritual authority; the Dajjal embodies deception, charisma without truth, and spiritual corruption.

• Eschatological Significance: It underscores key eschatological expectations in Islam—the coming tribulation of the Dajjal and the eventual triumphant return of ʿĪsā to restore justice.

• Lesson for Believers: Always discern beyond appearances. Genuine guidance often moves calmly and humbly, while falsehood may boldly parade as truth.

This dream, preserved in Sahih al‑Bukhārī, remains a profound narrative within Islamic theology—inviting believers to reflect, awaken spiritual insight, and remain rooted in truth as the world approaches its final hour.